Covello

(HC) Roessler v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20212:19-cv-02422California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LEE ROESSLER, Case No. 2:19-cv-02422-KJM-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

PATRICK COVELLO, ECF No. 13 Respondent.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 On March 20, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this case. ECF No. 13. After petitioner failed to timely respond to the motion, the court directed him to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition by no later than May 11, 2020. ECF No. 15. Thereafter, petitioner was granted six extensions of time to file a response to the pending motion, with the most recent extension granting petitioner until December 14, 2020 to file his response. ECF Nos. 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 28. Despite the numerous extensions, petitioner has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to respondent’s motion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.