(SS) Ratliff v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20211:19-cv-01166California6,101 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDITH RATLIFF,

Case No. 1:19-cv-01166-SKO 11 Plaintiff,

12 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. (Doc. 1)

17 _____________________________________/

19 I. INTRODUCTION On August 26, 2019, Plaintiff Edith Ratliff (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.1 28 1 Plaintiff was born on February 20, 1957, obtained a General Educational Development (GED) certificate, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.