(PS) Stewart v. Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of Hartford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20212:17-cv-02418California5,666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLEEN STEWART, No. 2:17-cv-2418-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT PROPERTY AND CASUALTY (ECF Nos. 61, 69, 73.)

INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Colleen Stewart alleges three insurance-styled claims concerning damage to her South Lake Tahoe residence. (ECF No. 1.) Defendant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford now moves for summary judgment, and Stewart opposes. (ECF Nos. 61, 69.) In addition to the dispositive motion, Hartford objects to some of Stewart’s evidence submitted with her opposition brief. (See ECF No. 73.) Further, Stewart submitted eight additional filings related to her opposition, after the deadline expired; the filings vary in subject matter, but mainly relate to Stewart’s request to submit more photos in support of her opposition (as well as the handling of these photos in discovery). (ECF Nos. 76,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.