(PC) Heard v. Superior Court of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20212:20-cv-01589California1,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNNIE HEARD, No. 2:20-cv-01589-KJM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the court. I. Screening Standard The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.