(PS) Atkinson v. Windsor El Camino Care Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20212:20-cv-02086California318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE R. ATKINSON, No. 2:20-cv-2086 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER WINDSOR EL CAMINO CARE CENTER and HEALTHCRE SERVICE GROUP, INC., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 21, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, though he has filed several other documents. ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7. None of plaintiff’s filings affect the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.