(PS)Seneka

(PS)Seneka v. County of Yolo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20212:20-cv-01621California9,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANA SENEKA, No. 2:20-cv-01621-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF YOLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action and has paid the filing fee. (ECF No 1.) Currently before the court are four motions to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 8, 10, 11, and 12.) For the reasons below, the court recommends granting the motions. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises from a custody dispute over plaintiff’s minor children. Plaintiff commenced this federal suit after a series of state administrative and judicial proceedings that began in 2018. In the 51-page First Amended Complaint, plaintiff names almost forty defendants and chronicles nearly every way in which she believes she was wronged throughout the juvenile dependency process. The large number of defendants sued, coupled with plaintiff’s failure to separate her causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.