Ciufo

(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20211:17-cv-00533California591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A

vs. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD

BE BENEFICIAL

JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

21 I. BACKGROUND Mitchell Garraway (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On November 27, 2018, the court issued a discovery and scheduling order, setting out deadlines for the parties including a discovery deadline of May 25, 2019, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.