Bugarin
(PC) Parrish v. Bugarin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAHEAL PARRISH, No. 1:19-cv-00490-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
BUGARIN, et al., DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS
Defendants. (Doc. No. 26)
17 Plaintiff Kaheal Parrish is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against defendants Camargo and Martinez, but he failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. The magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or notify the court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable claims. (Doc. No. 22.) On October 2, 2020, plaintiff notified the court of his willingness to proceed on the cognizable…