Bugarin

(PC) Parrish v. Bugarin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20211:19-cv-00490California726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAHEAL PARRISH, No. 1:19-cv-00490-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

BUGARIN, et al., DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 26)

17 Plaintiff Kaheal Parrish is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against defendants Camargo and Martinez, but he failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. The magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or notify the court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable claims. (Doc. No. 22.) On October 2, 2020, plaintiff notified the court of his willingness to proceed on the cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.