Sanders

Sanders v. Deputy District Attorney V. Lai

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20211:20-cv-00690California1,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILIP SANDERS, No. 1:20-cv-00690-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER CONSTRUING DECEMBER 14, 2020 FILING AS A MOTION FOR V. LAI, et al, RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING

SAME

Defendants. (Doc. No. 21)

17 Plaintiff Phillip Sanders is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 2, 2020, the magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff timely filed objections on November 24, 2020. (Doc. No. 11.) Plaintiff also filed a second amended complaint, without leave to amend having been granted, concurrently with his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.