Nepomuceno
(PC) Quezada v. Nepomuceno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALVARO QUEZADA, 1:20-cv-01351-NONE-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED AS
C. NEPOMUCENO, et al., MOOT (ECF Nos. 2, 5.) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
17 I. BACKGROUND Alvaro Quezada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on September 23, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 23, 2020, and October 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction which the court construes as motions for preliminary injunctive relief. (ECF Nos. 2, 5.) II. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable…