Nepomuceno

(PC) Quezada v. Nepomuceno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20211:20-cv-01351California779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALVARO QUEZADA, 1:20-cv-01351-NONE-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED AS

C. NEPOMUCENO, et al., MOOT (ECF Nos. 2, 5.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 I. BACKGROUND Alvaro Quezada (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on September 23, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 23, 2020, and October 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction which the court construes as motions for preliminary injunctive relief. (ECF Nos. 2, 5.) II. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.