Vongsvirates
Vongsvirates v. Rushmore Loan Management Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VICHAI VONGSVIRATES, Case No. 1:21-cv-00012-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING “EXHIBIT F”
v. (ECF No. 5) RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT
SERVICES,
15 Defendant.
17 Vichai Vongsvirates (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 18 action on January 4, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On January 8, 2021, the court screened Plaintiff’s 19 complaint and found that it did not state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted 20 leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Id.) On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed 21 a document entitled “Exhibit F”, which appears to be an addendum to the complaint, which 22 argues the merits of the action and that the foreclosure sale of the property should be reversed. 23 First, Plaintiff is advised that the Local Rules of the Eastern District Provide that a 24 complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.” 25 Local Rule 220. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint in a single filing. 26…