1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIGUEL S DELGADO, No. 1:21-cv-00080-JLT (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

13 v. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA

14 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,

15 Respondent. 16 17 18 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 19 jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all 20 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which 21 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part 22 of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action 23 may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant 24 is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 25 In this case, the petitioner is challenging a conviction from Santa Clara County, which is in 26 the Northern District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United 27 States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court 28 may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); 1 Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). 2 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this matter be transferred to the United States District 3 Court for the Northern District of California. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 6 Dated: January 22, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28