Dhillon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH MICHAEL CASSELLS, Case No. 2:19-cv-00644-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

BALRAJ SINGH DHILLON, ECF No. 23 Defendant.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 On November 6, 2020, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended 18 complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 23. To date, plaintiff 19 has not opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. 20 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party 21 is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the 22 date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a 23 statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the 24 motion and…