Hurley

(PC) Diaz v. Hurley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20212:19-cv-01241California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, No. 2:19-cv-1241 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed November 30, 2020, plaintiff was granted one final extension of time to file an amended complaint that complied with the June 11, 2020 order. The undersigned noted that plaintiff has had over five months to draft his amended complaint, and no further extensions of time would be granted. (ECF No. 42 at 2, 3.) Thirty days from November 30, 2020, have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complete amended complaint that complies with the June 11, 2020 order.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

On December 7, 2020, the undersigned addressed plaintiff’s unsigned and incomplete amended 26 complaint, which was apparently submitted to prison officials for mailing on November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.