Petras

(PC) Shipp v. Petras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20212:20-cv-00938California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZOAAN SHIPP, Case No. 2:20-cv-00938-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

DR. OGNJEN PETRAS, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 On September 29, 2020, the previously assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint, found that it failed to state a claim, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on November 5, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond to the court’s order could result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 2. To date, plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.