Wolf

(HC) Mirzada v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20212:20-cv-01250California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDUL GHAFFAR MIRZADA, Case No. 2:20-cv-01250-JAM-JDP (PC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

CHAD WOLF, et al. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL

RULES

Respondents.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 18 19 Petitioner, through his counsel, filed a habeas petition in the United States Court of 20 Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 1. The petition was subsequently transferred to this 21 district. On June 22, 2020, the Clerk of Court notified petitioner’s counsel, Sergio Valdovinos, 22 that he was not admitted to practice in this district. ECF No. 5. On October 16, 2020, petitioner 23 was ordered to show cause within fourteen days why the petition should not be dismissed due to 24 his counsel’s failure to obtain admission to practice in this district. ECF No. 7. Alternatively, 25 petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.