(PS) Cicalla v. Rogers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARTIN ANTHONY CICALLA, JR, No. 2:20-cv-01999 JAM AC PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DONNA ROGERS and THE ESTATE OF

LEON ROGERS,

14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On October 8, 2020, the court issued new civil case documents instructing plaintiff to serve the defendants within 90 days pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). ECF No. 3. Plaintiff did not timely file a proof of service. Concerned that plaintiff had abandoned this case, on January 8, 2021 the court issued an order to show cause by January 14, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure respond could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, has not filed…