(PC) Driver v. ADA 1824 Panels

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20211:19-cv-01718California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 1:19-cv-01718-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

ADA 1824 PANELS, et al., (Doc. No. 46) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Billy Driver Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 24, 2020, following a de novo review of the case, the undersigned adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s December 17, 2019 findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to pay the required filing fee in full within 21 days in order to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 40.) The court also warned plaintiff that failure to pay the filing fee would result in dismissal of this action. (Id. at 2.) On August 11, 2020, the undersigned dismissed the case without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.