Restivo

(PC) Harris v. Restivo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20211:20-cv-00797California1,455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, No. 1:20-cv-00797-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. RESTIVO, et al., (Doc. Nos. 1, 10) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Devonte Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 10, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that “[t]his case proceed on Plaintiff’s retaliation claims against defendants Levan and Restivo; Plaintiff’s section 1983 malicious prosecution claims against defendants Levan and Restivo; and Plaintiff’s Devereaux claims against defendants Levan, Reynolds, and Restivo,” and that “[a]ll other claims and defendants be dismissed.” (Doc. No. 10 at 20–21.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.