Brar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMANDEEP KAUR BRAR, No. 1:21-cv-00069-DAD-JLT Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

HARJIT KAUR DHAWILA, LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

KULWINDER KAUR DHAWILAL, AND JURISDICTION

PARGAT SINGH DHAWILAL, (Doc. No. 1) Defendants.

17 On January 18, 2021, plaintiff filed the pending pro se action, as well as moved for in forma pauperis status and for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 3.) The court reviewed the complaint in conjunction with its review of the motion for a temporary restraining order. Plaintiff alleges that this court has subject matter jurisdiction over her claims based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (See, e.g., Doc. No. 1-1.) However, plaintiff’s subject matter jurisdiction allegations are facially deficient because it appears all of the parties are residents of California and the required $75,000 amount in controversy is not…