Prado
Prado v. Target Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONICA PRADO, No. 1:20-cv-00556-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A
DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND
TARGET CORPORATION and DOES CLOSE THE CASE through 25, inclusive, (Doc. 8) Defendants.
17 18 On January 21, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation, signed by all parties who have appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 8.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after 26 service of an answer, by…