Frauenheim

(HC) Pena v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20212:15-cv-00416California483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO PENA, No. 2:15-cv-0416 JAM CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Respondent. 16 On December 29, 2020, petitioner was granted 21 days within which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Petitioner was informed that failure to respond to the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the order to show cause was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.