Ramsey

(PC) Prince v. Ramsey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20212:20-cv-01245California1,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAVID SWANK PRINCE, Case No. 2:20-cv-01245-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

MICHAEL RAMSEY, et al.,

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS

DEFENDANTS. ECF No. 14 14 15 Plaintiff David Swank Prince is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint, which alleges numerous instances of interference with his access to courts. ECF No. 14. I have reviewed those claims and, for the reasons stated below, find that they should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. I also find that giving plaintiff further opportunity to amend is unwarranted. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.