Ramsey
(PC) Prince v. Ramsey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DAVID SWANK PRINCE, Case No. 2:20-cv-01245-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
MICHAEL RAMSEY, et al.,
OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS
DEFENDANTS. ECF No. 14 14 15 Plaintiff David Swank Prince is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His initial complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint, which alleges numerous instances of interference with his access to courts. ECF No. 14. I have reviewed those claims and, for the reasons stated below, find that they should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. I also find that giving plaintiff further opportunity to amend is unwarranted. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that…