Vierra

(PC) Morrison v. Vierra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20212:20-cv-01924California889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE MORRISON, No. 2:20-cv-1924 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

E. VIERRA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and recommends this action be dismissed because it is duplicative of an action filed previously by plaintiff and because plaintiff fails to state a claim for relief cognizable under § 1983. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.