(SS) Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20211:16-cv-00544California1,168 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARLENE DENISE RODGERS, Case No. 1:16-cv-00544-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES

v. (Doc. No. 21) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Currently before the Court is the motion for attorney fees filed by Petitioner Cyrus Safa (“Counsel”), attorney for Darlene Denise Rodgers (“Plaintiff”), on December 11, 2020.1 (Doc. No. 21). Counsel requests fees in the amount of $9,000.00 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B), incorporating 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Id. at 4 and n. 2.) Plaintiff has not objected to the request. On December 15, 2020, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) filed a statement of non-opposition to fee request under § 406(b). (Doc. No. 22). I. Relevant Background Plaintiff filed this action challenging the denial of social security benefits on April 16, 2016. (Doc. No. 1.) On September 12, 2017, the Court issued an order reversing the 27 This action proceeds before the Honorable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.