Sherman
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20211:19-cv-00225California7,378 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDINGS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
vs. PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH
AMENDMENT CLAIMS AGAINST
SHERMAN, et al., DEFENDANTS SHERMAN AND MILAM, AND
THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FROM THIS Defendants. CASE BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 24.)
OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
19 I. BACKGROUND Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On February 15, 2019, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF No. 6.) On February 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended 26 …