Sherman
(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM SHARPE, No. 1:19-cv-00711-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR IN
v. CAMERA REVIEW C. CRYER, et al., (ECF No. 49) Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
16 (ECF No. 52)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND
DENYING IN PART, MOTION TO STAY (ECF No. 51) 20 On January 25, 2021, the parties attended a telephonic status and discovery conference. Plaintiff Adam Sharpe (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeared telephonically pro se. Counsel Andrea Sloan and Lawrence Bragg appeared telephonically on behalf of Defendants. Pending for review at the hearing were (1) the privilege log and documents for in camera review submitted by Defendants on December 15. 2020, (ECF No. 49); (2) Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, as to the…