(PC) Sosa v. CSATF Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20211:19-cv-01333California6,788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE LUIS SOSA, No. 1:19-cv-01333-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE DENIED R. HULSE, (ECF No. 18) Defendant. 16 Jorge Luis Sosa (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on September 9, 2019. (ECF No. 1). This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant R. Hulse (“Defendant”) and Does 1-3 for excessive force and sexual assault in violation of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights and retaliation in violation of Plaintiff’s First Amendment rights. (ECF Nos. 1 & 20 at 2). On April 9, 2020, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that Plaintiff’s claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 18 at 1). For the reasons below, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.