Martinez

(PC) L.C. Cunningham v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20211:19-cv-01508California2,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 L.C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:19-cv-01508-AWI-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE

DENIED

M. MARTINEZ, et al., (ECF NOS. 15, 19, & 45) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

L.C. Cunningham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 20, 2020, the Court allowed this case to proceed on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Harmon1 for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment and on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Martinez for violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. (ECF No. 25, p. 2). All other claims and defendants were dismissed. (Id.). On April 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 15). On May 28,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.