Okoroanyanwu
Okoroanyanwu v. MV Transportation, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 KIZITO OKOROANYANWU, Case No. 1:20-cv-00584-AWI-SKO 9 Plaintiff, v. ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING
SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF
Defendant. / FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
13 (Doc. 10)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff Kizito Okoroanyanwu is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). The Court has screened Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 20 and finds that it states cognizable Title VII claims against Defendant MV Transportation, Inc. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Arizona ex rel. Horne v. Geo Grp., Inc., 816 F.3d 1189, 1206 (9th Cir. 2016); Poland v. Chertoff, 494 F.3d 1174, 1179–80 (9th Cir. 2007); Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 358 F.3d 599, 603 (9th Cir. 2004); Hemmings v. Tidyman's Inc., 285 F.3d…