Cates

(PC) Clay v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20211:20-cv-00971California3,254 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEANGELO CLAY, No. 1:20-cv-00971-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

CATES, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BE

DISMISSED

Defendant. (ECF No. 18) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER FOR CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE 19 Plaintiff DeAngelo Clay (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on June 14, 2020. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”), which is now before the Court for screening, on January 21, 2021. (ECF No. 18). The Complaint brings claims concerning his institution of confinement’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court finds that the Complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.