Pfeiffer

(PC) Cruz v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 20211:20-cv-01522California1,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01522-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) CLARIFICATION

C. PFEIFFER, et al., ) (Doc. No. 10) ) ) Defendants. ) 13 )

Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2020, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in this action because he has suffered three or more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and failed to demonstrate imminent danger of serious physical injury. (Doc. No. 4.) With regard to the imminent danger exception, the Magistrate Judge specifically noted as follows: Here, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s allegations fail to demonstrate imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time of filing.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.