(PS) Krecz v. Google Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH KRECZ, No. 2:18-cv-01585-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER GOOGLE INC., (ECF Nos. 31, 32.) Defendant. 16 On January 4, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 32), which were served on the parties. On January 11, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 33), which have been considered by the court. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The…