Castro

(PC) McLaughlin v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20211:17-cv-01597California2,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN McLAUGHLIN, CASE NO. 1:17-cv-1597-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE

TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

J. CASTRO, et al., REMEDIES

(Doc. 33) Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. Plaintiff opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will recommend that the defendants’ motion be granted. I. Summary of Plaintiff’s Allegations This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint on a First Amendment retaliation claim against Correctional Officer M. Riley, Sergeant E. Magallanes, Chief Deputy Warden J. Castro, Correctional Counselor J. Perez, and Correctional Counselor D. DeAcevedo, and a Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.