Pizana

Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:18-cv-00644California3,146 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RAUL PIZANA, individually and on No. 1:18-cv-00644-DAD-SKO behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO Plaintiff, PARTIALLY QUASH OR MODIFY SUBPOENA TO THE FEDERAL TRADE v. COMMISSION 9 SANMEDICA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, (Doc. 113) and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendants. 12 This matter is before the Court on Defendant SanMedica International, LLC (“Defendant”)’s “Motion to Partially Quash or Modify Subpoena to the Federal Trade Commission” (the “Motion to Quash”). (Doc. 113.) Defendant and Plaintiff Raul Pizana (“Plaintiff”) filed their joint statement directed to the Motion to Quash (the “Joint Statement”), as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on December 30, 2020. (Doc. 126.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for January 6, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.