Sandoval

(PC) Randolph v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20211:18-cv-00968California667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00968-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND

v. MODIFY DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING

ORDER

SANDOVAL, et al., (ECF No. 39) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Colin M. Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Benavides and Carrillo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Sandoval, Speidell, and Benavides for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On October 13, 2020, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order setting the deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust) for August 23, 2021. (ECF No. 30.) On February 2, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.