Kernan

(PC) Florence v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:19-cv-00331California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID FLORENCE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00331-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DIRECT

CDCR SECRETARY TO DEDUCT

v. PERCENT FROM ALL OF PLAINTIFF’S

COURT FEES EQUALLY

KERNAN, et al., (ECF No. 41) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff David Florence (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting an order from the Court 19 directing the Secretary of CDCR to deduct 20 percent from all of Plaintiff’s court fees equally, 20 not individually, filed February 1, 2021. (ECF No. 41.) Plaintiff argues that when he receives 21 deposits to his trust account, only a total of 20 percent should be deducted from the deposit, 22 which should then be divided equally among the filing fees he owes to various courts. Plaintiff 23 has previously raised this argument before the Court. (ECF No. 35.) 24 As Plaintiff has been informed,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.