(SS) Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:19-cv-01313California5,422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NINA BAILEY,

Case No. 1:19-cv-01313-SKO Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. (Doc. 1) _____________________________________/ 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION On September 18, 2019, Plaintiff Nina Bailey (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.1 27 28 1 Plaintiff was born on March 22, 1965, completed high school, and previously worked as a sales associate and an in-home…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.