Zepp

(PC) Turner v. Zepp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20211:20-cv-00184California718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 VINCENT TURNER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00184-AWI-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. 13 ANDREW ZEPP, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Vincent Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2021, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference. Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Defendants Andrew Zepp and Khaled A. Tawansy failed to appear. Based upon the scheduling conference statements provided by Plaintiff and Defendant Andrew Zepp, in an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this 25 26 27 28 1 eee nnn nn on nnn nnn nnn ne OI I EO

1 || action,' and after consideration of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1),” IT IS ORDERED? 2 || that: 1. If any party receives documents regarding this case from a third party, including but not limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.