Zepp
(PC) Turner v. Zepp
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 VINCENT TURNER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00184-AWI-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE v. 13 ANDREW ZEPP, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Vincent Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2021, the Court held an Initial Scheduling Conference. Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Defendants Andrew Zepp and Khaled A. Tawansy failed to appear. Based upon the scheduling conference statements provided by Plaintiff and Defendant Andrew Zepp, in an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this 25 26 27 28 1 eee nnn nn on nnn nnn nnn ne OI I EO
1 || action,' and after consideration of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1),” IT IS ORDERED? 2 || that: 1. If any party receives documents regarding this case from a third party, including but not limited…