James
James v. Drivetime of Fresno
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20211:20-cv-00207California5,318 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VANESSA JAMES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00207-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION AND STAYING ACTION
DRIVETIME OF FRESNO, (ECF Nos 8, 9, 10-11, 12) Defendant.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
17 Currently before the Court is Drivetime of Fresno’s (“Defendant”) motion to compel arbitration which has been referred to the United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF No. 16.) The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). I. BACKGROUND On June 28, 2018, Vanessa James (“Plaintiff”) entered into a contract with Defendant to purchase a used 2015 Kia Optima. (Compl. ¶ 6, ECF No. 1-1.) Prior to purchasing the vehicle, Plaintiff was informed that the vehicle was…