Zepp
(PC) Turner v. Zepp
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 VINCENT TURNER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00184-AWI-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR DEFENDANT KHALED A. TAWANSY TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE v. SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AND FAILURE TO ANDREW ZEPP, et al., COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS 14 Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff Vincent Turner (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 17 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On June 23, 2020, the Court issued a screening order finding Plaintiff had stated a 19 cognizable claim against Defendants Andrew Zepp and Khaled A. Tawansy for deliberate 20 indifference to serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 15.) The 21 Court simultaneously issued an order finding service of the complaint appropriate. (ECF No. 22 16.) 23 On August 28, 2020, the Court entered an Order Setting an Initial Scheduling 24 Conference and Requiring Initial…