Sherman
(PC) Kyle Nargiz v. Sherman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:19-cv-01173California5,087 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KYLE NARGIZ, 1:19-cv-01173-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS
SHERMAN AND MILAN FOR ADVERSE
STUART SHERMAN, et al., CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT UNDER
THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND
Defendants. DISMISSING ALL OTHER CLAIMS (ECF No. 13.)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14)
DAYS
21 I. BACKGROUND Kyle Nargiz (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On August 31, 2020, the court issued an order dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 12.) On October 1, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint which is now before the court for screening. (ECF No. 13.) 28…