Arnold

Arnold v. Loancare, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:20-cv-00189California6,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBLY ARNOLD and BYRON No. 1:20-cv-00189-NONE-EPG

ARNOLD,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED AND v. RECOMMENDING THAT UNSERVED DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED SUA LOANCARE, LLC, et al., SPONTE 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 18)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL (ECF No. 29) 19 Plaintiffs Kimbly Arnold and Byron Arnold (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against 20 Defendant Loancare, LLC a/k/a Lakeview Loan Service, LLC (“Loancare”) and two Doe 21 Defendants in the Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus on December 31, 2019. 22 (ECF No. 1-2 at 2). The complaint alleges that Defendants, who were Plaintiffs’ creditors, 23 misstated the amount remaining on Plaintiffs’ loans. Loancare removed the action to this Court on 24 February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.