Cantu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROGER CANTU, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00538-NONE-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO

SUPPLEMENT BRIEFING ON COUNTY

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

KINGS COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

14 Currently before the Court are two motions to dismiss filed by Kings County, David Robinson, Kings County Sheriff, Kings County Sheriff Department (hereafter “County Defendants”), and NaphCare, Inc. (hereafter “Defendant NaphCare”). (ECF Nos. 6, 10.) The matters have been referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (ECF No. 15.) Upon review of the County Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the Court finds that the parties have not adequately briefed the dismissal of Defendant Kings County Sheriff’s Department. The Court shall require the parties to file supplemental briefing on this issue. Defendants County of Kings and the Kings County Sheriff Department argue that they are …