Koenig

(HC) Thomas v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 20211:20-cv-00996California561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOSH D. THOMAS, No. 1:20-cv-00996-NONE-JLT (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT

v. PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

AND TO DISMISS § 2254 PETITION

C. KOENIG, (Doc. Nos. 1, 17, 19) Respondent. 16 A few months after petitioner Hosh D. Thomas filed the instant § 2254 petition seeking federal habeas relief, he moved to withdraw his petition “[d]ue to recent changes in state law affecting issues not presented” on the petition. (Doc. Nos. 1; 17 at 1.) While respondent has not filed an answer in this case, respondent has filed a statement of non-opposition to petitioner’s motion to withdraw his petition. (Doc. No. 18.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, this matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. On November 23, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that petitioner’s motion to withdraw and to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.