(PC) Williams v. Delano Regional Medical Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:20-cv-01563California534 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH VERNON WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01563-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

DELANO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., (Doc. 8) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Ralph Vernon Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a 19 document in which he states that he would “like to know the status of [his] case” and “to present 20 evidence of [his] injuries,” and that he “need[s] [a] legal representative.” (Doc. 8.) 21 As stated in the Court’s First Informational Order, because Plaintiff is incarcerated and seeks relief against governmental entities or employees, his complaint is subject to screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A. (Doc. 3 at 3.) The Court will screen the complaint in due course. As also stated in the informational order, the Court does “not serve as a repository for evidence.” (Id.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.