Navarro

(PC) Redix v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20211:20-cv-01647California585 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESAU REDIX, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01647-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

J. NAVARRO, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) CLAIMS ) ) (ECF Nos. 8, 9) )

Plaintiff Esau Redix is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that he stated cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Navarro, Vera, Medina, Allison, and Higuera; a cognizable claim for sexual assault against Defendant Vera; a cognizable claim against Defendants Navarro and Allison for death threats; and a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to his medical needs against Defendants Navarro, Gonzales,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.