1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-001605-DAD-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

13 v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

14 EAST AFRICAN HUMANITARIAN

ORGANIZATION PROPERTIES, INC., FIVE DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendant. 16

17 18 On November 12, 2020, Plaintiff George Avalos filed this action against Defendant East 19 African Humanitarian Organization Properties, Inc. On January 27, 2021, due to the upcoming 20 scheduling conference on February 11, 2021, Plaintiff was ordered to file a notice of status of 21 service on the defendant within five days. More than five days have passed and Plaintiff has not 22 filed a notice of status of service or otherwise responded to the January 27, 2021 order. 23 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 24 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 25 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 26 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 27 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause in writing within five (5) 2 | days from the date of entry of this order why sanctions should not issue for the failure to comply 3 | with the January 27, 2021 order. Plaintiff is forewarned that failure to comply with this 4 | order will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply 5 | and failure to prosecute. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. LF. 2 Po g Dated: _ February 4, 2021 "

9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28