Castro

(PC) Williams v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:20-cv-01617California553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ) THIS ACTION

CASTRO, et al., ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN Defendants. ) CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS ) ) (ECF Nos. 14, 15)

Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 8, 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s first complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendant Regado for making death threats, and against Defendants Regado, Ruiz, and Castro for deliberate indifference to his safety and violation of the Equal Protection Clause. (ECF No. 14.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.