Castro
(PC) Williams v. Castro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ) THIS ACTION
CASTRO, et al., ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN Defendants. ) CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS ) ) (ECF Nos. 14, 15)
Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 8, 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s first complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendant Regado for making death threats, and against Defendants Regado, Ruiz, and Castro for deliberate indifference to his safety and violation of the Equal Protection Clause. (ECF No. 14.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. …