Fisher

Fisher v. Army National Guard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20211:20-cv-01471California869 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHANNA FISHER, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01471-NONE-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Johanna Fisher and J.G., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, Johanna Fisher (“Plaintiffs”) filed the complaint commencing this action on October 15, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The complaint listed three known defendants—Army National Guard, California Army National Guard, and California Military Department—and Does 1-10. The clerk of court issued summons on October 16, 2020. (ECF Nos. 5-6). Plaintiffs and Defendant California Military Department (“CMD”) filed four stipulations to extend time in this action. (ECF Nos. 12, 13, 15, 17). The first, signed by both parties, indicated that “CMD was served on October 23, 2020[.]” (ECF No. 12 at 2). Their two most- recent stipulations indicated that Plaintiffs also filed a lawsuit in state court against Porterville Military Academy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.